These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Rosenbluth-sampled nonequilibrium work method for calculation of free energies in molecular simulation.
    Author: Wu D, Kofke DA.
    Journal: J Chem Phys; 2005 May 22; 122(20):204104. PubMed ID: 15945710.
    Abstract:
    We present methods that introduce concepts from Rosenbluth sampling [M. N. Rosenbluth and A. W. Rosenbluth, J. Chem. Phys. 23, 356 (1955)] into the Jarzynski nonequilibrium work (NEW) free-energy calculation technique [C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690 (1997)]. The proposed hybrid modifies the way steps are taken in the NEW process. With it, each step is selected from a range of alternatives, with bias given to steps that contribute the least work. The definition of the work average is modified to account for the bias. We introduce two variants of this method, lambda-bias sampling and configuration-bias sampling, respectively; a combined lambda- and configuration-bias method is also considered. By reducing the likelihood that large nonequilibrated work values enter the ensemble average, the Rosenbluth sampling aids in remedying problems of inaccuracy of the calculation. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed methods through a model system of N independent harmonic oscillators. This model captures the difficulties involved in calculating free energies in real systems while retaining many tractable features that are helpful to the study. We examine four variants of this model that differ qualitatively in the nature of their phase-space overlap. Results indicate that the lambda-bias sampling method is most useful for systems with entropic sampling barriers, while the configuration-bias methods are best for systems with energetic sampling barriers. The Rosenbluth-sampling schemes yield much more accurate results than the unbiased nonequilibrium work method. Typically the accuracy can be improved by about an order of magnitude for a given amount of sampling; this improvement translates into two or more orders of magnitude less sampling required to obtain a given level of accuracy, owing to the generally slow convergence of the NEW calculation when the inaccuracy is large.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]