These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Unilateral subcutaneous bee venom but not formalin injection causes contralateral hypersensitized wind-up and after-discharge of the spinal withdrawal reflex in anesthetized spinal rats. Author: You HJ, Arendt-Nielsen L. Journal: Exp Neurol; 2005 Sep; 195(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 15950221. Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the effect of tonic nociception on spinal withdrawal reflexes including (1) long lasting spontaneous responses elicited by subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of formalin (2.5%, 50 microl) and bee venom (BV, 0.2 mg/50 microl) into the hind paw and (2) corresponding ipsilateral (primary) and contralateral (secondary) hypersensitivity to noxious pinch and repetitive supra-threshold (1.5 x T) electrical stimuli at different frequencies (3 Hz: wind-up; 20 Hz: after-discharge) in anesthetized spinal rats. Spinal withdrawal reflexes were studied by simultaneously assessing single motor units (SMUs) electromyographic (EMG) activities from the bilateral medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscles. Subcutaneous formalin-induced persistent spontaneous SMU EMG responses were in typical biphasic manner with an apparent silent period (about 13-18 min), but in contrast, BV elicited monophasic long lasting (about 1 h) SMU EMG responses without any resting state. The mechanically and electrically evoked responsiveness of SMUs were enhanced significantly by ipsilateral BV injection, whereas enhanced electrically, but not mechanically, evoked responses (including wind-up and after-discharge) were found at the non-injection site of the contralateral hind paw. However, s.c. administration of formalin was only able to establish ipsilateral hypersensitivity of the SMUs to repeated electrical, not mechanical, stimulation. Neither mechanically nor electrically evoked contralateral hypersensitivity of the SMUs was found during the ipsilateral formalin-induced nociception. For pharmacological intervention, intrathecal administration of the non-N-methyl-d-aspartate (non-NMDA) receptor antagonist CNQX (40 nmol/10 microl), but not the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (40 nmol/10 microl), significantly depressed BV-induced contralateral hypersensitivity of the SMUs to repeated 3 Hz (wind-up) and 20 Hz (after-discharge) frequencies of electrical stimulation. Using the extracellular SMU recording technique, we found that s.c. administration of formalin and BV shows a significant difference in long lasting spontaneous firing of SMUs. This is consistent with previous observations in animal behavioral studies. Additionally, contralateral electrically evoked hypersensitivity of the SMUs was found only following BV injection, not in the formalin test. The maintenance and development of BV-induced contralateral hypersensitivity of the spinal withdrawal reflex to noxious electrical stimulation indeed depend on different central pharmacological receptors. The spinal non-NMDA, but not the NMDA, receptors may play important role in BV-induced contralateral central hyperexcitability and sensitization.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]