These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Drug utilization and pharmaceutical cost-containment in germany-perspectives 1 year after enactment of the GMG].
    Author: Schlander M.
    Journal: Med Klin (Munich); 2005 Jun 15; 100(6):314-24. PubMed ID: 15968483.
    Abstract:
    After 3 decades of health care cost containment in Germany, enactment of the most recent reform (Health Insurance Modernization Act, GMG) marks a watershed insofar as, apparently, the potential has been largely exhausted for further savings in pharmaceutical spending. Yet the new drugs segment maintains its role as a growth driver, owing to the continuing shift from older to new, and frequently more expensive, products. This observation holds true even after introducing phase 2 reference pricing, covering so-called me too products. Health economic analyses would be required to better differentiate pharmaceutical products based on their incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. However, the opportunity was missed with the GMG to introduce formal health-economic evaluations and thus overcome the counterproductive silo mentality associated with traditional German component management. International experience from Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom suggests that economic evaluations, while informing rational reimbursement decisions, may in fact contribute to increasing pharmaceutical expenditures. Further tightening of pharmaceutical component management in Germany may result in increasing inefficiencies due to underuse of effective products; furthermore, it appears conceivable that ("second order") dynamic inefficiencies and, hence, social costs might be the consequence of reduced pharmaceutical research and development expenditures.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]