These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Compression and peri-ulcer skin in outpatients' venous leg ulcers: results of a French survey.
    Author: Dereure O, Vin F, Lazareth I, Bohbot S.
    Journal: J Wound Care; 2005 Jun; 14(6):265-71. PubMed ID: 15974413.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate concordance with compression therapy in ambulatory patients with venous leg ulcers. METHOD: This was a prospective observational survey conducted in general practice. Consecutive patients with venous leg ulcers about to receive a non-adherent primary dressing and with no contraindication to compression bandaging were selected. At the inclusion visit, size, local aspect of the ulcer and the peri-ulcer skin were scored. Patients were asked about concordance with compression and were given a questionnaire to be completed at home. If patients were seen at a three-week follow-up visit, ulcer and peri-ulcer characteristics and concordance were reassessed. RESULTS: A total of 2842 patients were included, of whom 2532 were re-evaluated at three weeks and 1397 (49%) returned their questionnaire. A compression bandage was already available for 62.9% of these patients, and 62.7% said they used it on a daily basis, 23.3% wore it one or two days per week and 13.7% wore it irregularly or never. There was a statistically significant correlation between concordance with compression and ulcer and peri-ulcer skin severity scores (p < 0.001 and p = 0.042 respectively). At the follow-up visit, concordance with compression therapy improved (80.1% were wearing it regularly). Ulcer, peri-ulcer skin severity scores and ulcer size were significantly lower (p < 0.001) when concordance with compression therapy was good. However, 65.6% of patients considered applying compression very difficult; 45% considered it very unaesthetic and 23% judge wearing it to be very painful, while 9% thought it may worsen their ulcer. CONCLUSION: On a short-term basis, concordance with compression can be substantially improved by simple measures with a clear favourable consequence on both ulcer status and peri-ulcer skin aspect when a non-adherent primary dressing is used. However, the acceptability of compression to patients is poor, and continuous effort is required to convince them of its importance.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]