These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Frequency map variations in squirrel monkey primary auditory cortex.
    Author: Cheung SW.
    Journal: Laryngoscope; 2005 Jul; 115(7):1136-44. PubMed ID: 15995498.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work is to understand the neural basis for cortical representation of hearing in highly vocal primates to gain insights into the substrates for communication. Variation patterns in frequency representation among animals are incorporated into an explanatory model to reconcile heterogeneous observations. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective. METHODS: Thirty-four squirrel monkeys underwent microelectrode mapping experiments in primary auditory cortex (AI) using tone pip stimuli. Characteristic frequency (CF) was extracted from the excitatory frequency receptive field. Frequency maps were reconstructed using Voronoi-Dirichlet tessellation. The spatial locations (rostral vs. caudal) of highest CF isofrequency contours (minimum length 1 mm) and highest CF neuronal clusters on the temporal gyral surface were analyzed. RESULTS: Isofrequency contours at least 1 mm long with CFs greater than 2.9 kHz (75% cases) are accessible on the temporal gyrus. Variability of the highest CF isofrequency contours accessible on the temporal gyrus has an interquartile range from 2.9 to 5.1 (mean 4.3) kHz. The highest CF isofrequency contours are located mainly in rostral AI, whereas the highest CF neuronal clusters flanking fully expressed isofrequency contours are equally distributed in rostral and caudal locations. CONCLUSIONS: Squirrel monkey AI frequency map variations are sizeable across animals and small within single animals (interhemispheric comparison). AI frequency map variations, modeled as translations and rotations relative to the lateral sulcus, are independent transfers. Caution must be exercised when interpreting nominal frequency map changes that are attributed to hearing loss and auditory learning effects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]