These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is white blood cell reduction equivalent to antibody screening in preventing transmission of cytomegalovirus by transfusion? A review of the literature and meta-analysis.
    Author: Vamvakas EC.
    Journal: Transfus Med Rev; 2005 Jul; 19(3):181-99. PubMed ID: 16010649.
    Abstract:
    The question whether the use of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative versus white blood cell (WBC)-reduced blood components is equally efficacious in preventing transfusion-acquired CMV infection remains unresolved. A total of 829 recipients of CMV-seronegative components were followed in 11 studies, and a total of 878 recipients of WBC-reduced components were followed in 12 studies. Twelve (1.45%) of 829 recipients of CMV-seronegative components and 24 (2.73%) of 878 recipients of WBC-reduced components developed CMV infection in these studies. Among bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients, the risk of CMV infection was, respectively, 1.63% (11/674) and 3.01% (21/697). Four of 7 controlled studies of CMV-seronegative components and 1 of 3 controlled studies of WBC-reduced components indicated benefit from these special components compared with CMV-unscreened/non-WBC-reduced components. One of 3 controlled studies indicated benefit from CMV-seronegative components, as compared with WBC-reduced components. Across a subset of studies whose results were integrated in a meta-analysis, CMV-seronegative or WBC-reduced components were virtually equivalent to each other when they were compared with CMV-unscreened/non-WBC-reduced components. CMV-seronegative components were associated with a 93.1% reduction in the risk of CMV infection; WBC-reduced components were associated with a 92.3% reduction in risk (summary odds ratio [OR] = 0.069; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.037-0.128; P < .05; and summary OR = 0.077; 95% CI, 0.031-0.190; P < .05, respectively). However, across 3 studies that compared CMV-seronegative and WBC-reduced components to each other, CMV-seronegative components were associated with a 58% reduction in risk (summary OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.79; P < .05). Thus, a meta-analysis of the available controlled studies indicates that CMV-seronegative blood components are more efficacious than WBC-reduced blood components in preventing transfusion-acquired CMV infection.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]