These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of late toxicity between continuous low-dose-rate and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer patients.
    Author: Bachtiary B, Dewitt A, Pintilie M, Jezioranski J, Ahonen S, Levin W, Manchul L, Yeung I, Milosevic M, Fyles A.
    Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov 15; 63(4):1077-82. PubMed ID: 16024181.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare survival and severe late radiation toxicity between patients who received continuous low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT) and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) BT for cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of cervical cancer patients who underwent primary radiotherapy with or without concurrent cisplatin was performed. Late Grade 3 or worse toxicities were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. The study endpoints were overall and disease-free survival and the probability of severe late toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients (65.7%) received LDR BT and 57 (34.3%) received PDR BT. Seventy patients received concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin. The 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rate was 70% and 57% for the LDR group and 82% and 70% for the PDR group, respectively (p = 0.25 and p = 0.19). The 3-year probability rate for late Grade 3 or worse toxicity was 7.4% for LDR BT patients and 7.6% for PDR BT patients, respectively (p = 0.69) and 6.9% and 7.6%, respectively, for concurrent chemotherapy vs. none (p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: No difference was found in severe late toxicity, overall survival, or disease-free survival between the LDR and PDR groups.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]