These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In vitro penetration of fresh and vitrified swine oocytes by homologous spermatozoa using different incubation systems.
    Author: Macedo MC, Deschamps JC, Lucia T, Bordignon J, Serret CG, Rambo G, Pivato I, Schmitt E.
    Journal: Anim Reprod Sci; 2006 May; 92(3-4):334-48. PubMed ID: 16046254.
    Abstract:
    The present study consisted of two experiments. In the first one, ejaculates from four boars were used to compare in vitro penetration (IVP) rates of fresh and vitrified swine oocytes by homologous spermatozoa in four treatments: fresh oocytes in conventional incubation (CO2 incubator) (FC), vitrified oocytes in conventional incubation (VC), fresh oocytes in submarine (bag) incubation (FS) and vitrified oocytes in submarine incubation (VS). The IVP rates for FC, VC, FS and VS were 46.5, 44.3, 36.9 and 33.1%, respectively. Analysis through Chi-square tests identified no differences in IVP rates between FC and VC and between FS and VS (P > 0.05), but IVP rate for FC was greater (P < 0.05) than those for both FS and VS. Besides IVP rate for VC did not differ (P > 0.05) from those for FC and FS, but it was greater than that for VS (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified differential effects of treatments dependant on individual boars. The second experiment evaluated the influence of semen storage period on the semen quality of the two boars associated with greater IVP rate in the first experiment. Semen quality was estimated by IVP rate using the VC treatment and by the following methods: sperm motility, sperm morphology, hypoosmotic swelling test (HOST) and thermal stress test (TST). According to analysis using Chi-square tests, IVP rate did not differ (P > 0.05), for the first boar, between 0 (100.0%) and 24 h of semen storage (98.1%) nor after 48 and 72 h (66.0 and 59.3%, respectively), but IVP rates were greater during the 0-24 h period compared with the 48-72 h period (P < 0.05). For the second boar, IVP rate at 0 h (50.6%) was greater (P < 0.05) than at 24, 48 and 72 h of semen storage (34.3, 28.3 and 24.0%, respectively), with no further differences observed after 24 h (P > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified that the effect of storage on IVP rate was influenced by the effect of individual boars. No differences in semen quality during the storage period were identified by conventional methods of semen evaluation, for either boar (P > 0.05) using analysis of variance with repeated measures. These results indicate that IVP test can be used to estimate boar fertility, even when vitrified oocytes are used (if using conventional CO2 incubators) or using an alternative submarine incubation system (if using fresh oocytes). The IVP test was the only method of semen evaluation that identified the reduction in semen quality up to 72 h of storage.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]