These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Platelets in the paediatric population: the influence of age and the limitations of automation.
    Author: Felle P, McMahon C, Rooney S, Donnelly P, Ni Chonchubhair F.
    Journal: Clin Lab Haematol; 2005 Aug; 27(4):250-7. PubMed ID: 16048493.
    Abstract:
    Accurate and precise platelet counting is important for the clinical management of children with platelet disorders. Current automated technologies are often unable to discriminate platelets from non-platelet particles particularly in circumstances where platelet anisocytosis is common. This study compares manual methodology and the automated technologies; impedance, optical density and CD61 immunoplatelet method (available on the Cell Dyn 4000) with the reference method of flow cytometric analysis in a paediatric population. A total of 141 samples were analysed and divided into specific age related groups and groups with thrombocytopenia and thrombocytosis. Data analysis showed that the CD61 method compared best with the reference method and this was evident in all the specified groups. The mean platelet count obtained by optical and manual methods were lower, suggesting that these methods are less reliable. The impedance count method was accurate despite its limitations. Strong correlations were observed in the 2-14 year age group but there was greater variation in the <1 month group supporting the theory that there is a greater variation in platelet characteristics in neonates. The CD61 method is the automated method of choice and would be particularly useful in the problem groups (platelet counts <50 x 10(9)/l and neonates <1 month old).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]