These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The F + 0 protocol for diuretic renography results in fewer interrupted studies due to voiding than the F - 15 protocol.
    Author: Liu Y, Ghesani NV, Skurnick JH, Zuckier LS.
    Journal: J Nucl Med; 2005 Aug; 46(8):1317-20. PubMed ID: 16085588.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: Timing of diuretic administration is not universally standardized in renography. Over the past year, our practice has changed from F-15 administration of furosemide to an F + 0 protocol. Therefore, we have retrospectively compared these 2 cohorts to assess if the shorter interval between diuretic administration and study completion in the F + 0 study results in a greater frequency of patients able to complete the subsequent 30-min dynamic acquisition without disruption due to voiding. METHODS: We identified 108 diuretic (99m)Tc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine renograms performed in the previous 18-mo period. Three patients were given furosemide at 30 min after the radiopharmaceutical and were excluded. Twenty studies in children under 3 y of age were excluded from consideration because voiding is neither restricted in this age group nor does voiding into a diaper cause disruption. Forty milligrams of furosemide were administered to adults, whereas 0.5 mg/kg was given to children. In the first cohort of 56 studies, radiopharmaceutical was administered 15 min after furosemide (F-15), whereas, in the second cohort of 29 patients, it was administered immediately thereafter (F + 0). In all cases, patients were asked to void proximal to radiopharmaceutical injection. Dynamic images and renogram curves were inspected for evidence of interruption or voiding midstudy. Statistical significance was determined by a 1-tailed Fisher exact test for proportions, with P < 0.05. RESULTS: The F-15 and F+0 groups of patients were comparable in terms of age, sex, and diuretic amount. In 17 of the F-15 patients, renography was interrupted because of voiding (30%), whereas this occurred in only 3 of the F + 0 patients (10%). This difference was significant at the P = 0.033 level. The mean time of voiding was 18.3 min (range, 12-25 min) for F-15 patients and 16 min (range, 12-19 min) for the F + 0 group. CONCLUSION: The F + 0 renal diuretic protocol is associated with a significantly lower rate of disruption because of voiding than the F-15 protocol, likely due to the shorter period between diuretic administration and study termination, which results in less bladder distention and discomfort. On the basis of these data, the F + 0 protocol appears to be a more tolerable procedure.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]