These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Discrepancy between morphologic and functional criteria of optimal stent deployment using intravascular ultrasound and pressure derived myocardial fractional flow reserve.
    Author: Stempfle HU, König A, Drescher E, Siebert U, Klauss V.
    Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2005; 7(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 16093220.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Pressure derived myocardial FFR, a functional index of epicardial stenosis has been proposed for the assessment of optimal stent deployment. The following study evaluated the potential of serial fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in comparison to the 'gold standard' intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for optimal stent deployment and its long-term outcome. METHODS: 35 patients with a single de novo lesion underwent PTCA followed by stent implantation with an initial inflation pressure of 12 atm. If optimal stent expansion using IVUS-criteria were not fulfilled, re-dilatation at 16 atm as well as additional inflations with larger balloon sizes were performed to reach the procedural end-point. IVUS and FFR were performed after each dilatation (n = 136). Angiography was repeated after 6 months. RESULTS: In 30 pts who fulfilled IVUS criteria, mean lumen area (2.9+/-1.3 mm2) increased after PTCA and stent implantation to 10.0+/-3.0 mm2. In six pts, optimum stent deployment according to a value of FFR0.94 was not reached. Four of six pts reached the IVUS criteria at 12 atm and two pts at 16 atm, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values of FFR were 26 and 64%. Three of the 30 pts (10%) revealed a restenosis at three months follow-up. One of these restenosis was seen in a patient with a post-procedural FFR<0.94. CONCLUSIONS: FFR was not valid to predict optimal stent expansion according to IVUS criteria but could delineate under-expanded stents despite a reasonable angiographic appearance. Morphologic (IVUS) and functional criteria (FFR) for optimal stent deployment revealed a comparably low restenosis rate.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]