These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Usefulness of PCR in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Tunisia.
    Author: Chargui N, Bastien P, Kallel K, Haouas N, Akrout FM, Masmoudi A, Zili J, Chaker E, Othman AD, Azaiez R, Crobu L, Mezhoud H, Babba H.
    Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2005 Oct; 99(10):762-8. PubMed ID: 16095641.
    Abstract:
    We assessed the efficiency of a PCR method in establishing the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Tunisian patients. Four hundred and thirty specimens collected passively from patients with cutaneous ulcers suggestive of leishmaniasis attending health centres for diagnosis were included in the study. Dermal scrapings were analysed both by parasitological (examination of Giemsa-stained smears and in vitro cultivation) methods and by a genus-specific PCR detecting a fragment of the 18S rRNA gene. Microscopy revealed amastigotes in 245 samples (57.0%) and in vitro cultivation gave positive results in 88 cases (20.5%), whereas PCR detected Leishmania in 301 samples (70%). The sensitivities inferred from our results were 99.3%, 80.8% and 29% for PCR, microscopic examination and in vitro cultivation, respectively. The different forms of CL in this country are caused by three species of Leishmania and are treated with the same protocol. Of 303 well-documented cases in our study, 99% were probably caused by Leishmania major and 1% by Leishmania infantum. The lack of species-specific diagnosis is not known to affect treatment or prognosis in Tunisia. These data support the incorporation of PCR into diagnostic strategies for CL, particularly in Tunisia.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]