These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Sequence and hydropathy profile analysis of two classes of secondary transporters.
    Author: Lolkema JS, Slotboom DJ.
    Journal: Mol Membr Biol; 2005; 22(3):177-89. PubMed ID: 16096261.
    Abstract:
    A structural class in the MemGen classification of membrane proteins is a set of evolutionary related proteins sharing a similar global fold. A structural class contains both closely related pairs of proteins for which homology is clear from sequence comparison and very distantly related pairs, for which it is not possible to establish homology based on sequence similarity alone. In the latter case the evolutionary link is based on hydropathy profile analysis. Here, we use these evolutionary related sets of proteins to analyze the relationship between E-values in BLAST searches, sequence similarities in multiple sequence alignments and structural similarities in hydropathy profile analyses. Two structural classes of secondary transporters termed ST[3], which includes the Ion Transporter (IT) superfamily and ST[4], which includes the DAACS family (TC# 2.A.23) were extracted from the NCBI protein database. ST[3] contains 2051 unique sequences distributed over 32 families and 59 subfamilies. ST[4] is a smaller class containing 399 unique sequences distributed over 2 families and 7 subfamilies. One subfamily in ST[4] contains a new class of binding protein dependent secondary transporters. Comparison of the averaged hydropathy profiles of the subfamilies in ST[3] and ST[4] revealed that the two classes represent different folds. Divergence of the sequences in ST[4] is much smaller than observed in ST[3], suggesting different constraints on the proteins during evolution. Analysis of the correlation between the evolutionary relationship of pairs of proteins in a class and the BLAST E-value revealed that: (i) the BLAST algorithm is unable to pick up the majority of the links between proteins in structural class ST[3], (ii) "low complexity filtering" and "composition based statistics" improve the specificity, but strongly reduce the sensitivity of BLAST searches for distantly related proteins, indicating that these filters are too stringent for the proteins analyzed, and (iii) the E-value cut-off, which may be used to evaluate evolutionary significance of a hit in a BLAST search is very different for the two structural classes of membrane proteins.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]