These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Experimental study of tissue engineered bone with cryopreservation on healing of bone defects].
    Author: Luo X, Yang Z, Deng L.
    Journal: Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 19(7):569-73. PubMed ID: 16108348.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of tissue engineered bone with cryopreservation on healing of bone defects and to explore feasibility of cryopreservation for tissue engineered bone. METHODS: Tissue engineered bones were constructed with osteoblasts being seeded onto bio-derived materials made from fresh human bones,and they were preserved at 4 degrees C and - 196 degrees C for 3 months and 6 months respectively. They were applied to repair segmental bone defects of rabbit's radius while the tissue engineered bone without cryopreservation and bio-derived materials were brought into control groups. The experiment was divided into groups A3, A6, B3, B6, C and D (group A3: tissue engineered bones were preserved at 4 degrees C for 3 months; group A6: tissue engineered bones were preserved at 4 degrees C for 6 months; group B3:tissue engineered bones were preserved at --196 degrees C for 3 months; group B6:tissue engineered bones were preserved at - 196 degrees C for 6 months; group C: tissue engineered bones without cryopreservation; group D: bio-derived materials). Macroscopical and histological examination were done at the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th weeks, X-ray examination was done at the 6th, 12th weeks and biomechanics were determined at 12th weeks after operation respectively. RESULTS: Macroscopical observation showed no significant differences among group A3, A6, B3, B6 and C, but less new bone formation and more obvious boundary in group D were observed. Histological observation showed more collagen and new bone around the edge of implant of group A3, A6, B3, B6 and C than group D, and histological evaluation showed significant differences between group D and other groups (P <0.05). Radiographic observation showed no absorbability of the implant cortex and less new bone formation in group D, but the unity between implant and host bone, medullary cavity reopened, disappearance of fracture line and fine bone modelling were observed in other groups at 12 weeks after operation. Biomechanics between group D and other groups showed significant differences (P< 0. 05). CONCLUSION: Cryopreservation (4 degrees C and - 196 degrees C) were capable of preserving tissue engineered bone for long time, and tissue engineered bone with cryopreservation has significant effect on healing of bone defects. The methods fit clinical application.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]