These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of regional tracer delay on CBF in healthy subjects measured with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with 15O-PET.
    Author: Ibaraki M, Shimosegawa E, Toyoshima H, Ishigame K, Ito H, Takahashi K, Miura S, Kanno I.
    Journal: Magn Reson Med Sci; 2005; 4(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16127251.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Deconvolution based on truncated singular value decomposition (SVD deconvolution) is a promising method for measuring cerebral blood flow (CBF) with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI), but it has proved extremely sensitive to tracer delay. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of regional tracer delay on CBF determined by SVD deconvolution (SVD-CBF). SVD-CBFs with and without correction for the delay were compared with CBF measured by positron emission tomography (PET-CBF), which is regarded as the gold standard for quantification of CBF. METHODS: Perfusion MRI and PET were performed on seven healthy men. In the PET study, the CBF image was obtained with bolus injection of H2(15)O and continuous arterial sampling. In the DSC-MRI study with bolus injection of Gd-based contrast agent, dynamic perfusion data were obtained with a 1.5T scanner at 1-s intervals by means of gradient-echo echo-planar imaging. CBF was determined by the SVD deconvolution method with and without correction for the tracer delay. Region-of-interest measurements were obtained in the gray matter (cerebral cortex in the middle cerebral artery territory) and white matter (centrum semiovale). RESULTS: Tracer delay was significantly longer in white matter than in gray matter (1.45+/-0.61 s vs. 0.59+/-0.35 s, P<0.01). Correction for the delay increased SVD-CBF in the white matter and consequently reduced the gray-to-white SVD-CBF ratio. The uncorrected gray-to-white SVD-CBF ratio was significantly larger than that of PET-CBF (3.33+/-0.66 vs. 2.54+/-0.49, P<0.01). However, the gray-to-white delay-corrected SVD-CBF ratio did not differ significantly from that of PET-CBF (2.83+/-0.31 vs. 2.54+/-0.49, P=0.10). CONCLUSION: The tracer delay in DSC-MRI causes errors in CBF estimates, even in healthy persons, and therefore should be corrected for when delay-sensitive deconvolution, such as SVD deconvolution, is used.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]