These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A cost-effectiveness and cost-utility study of lung transplantation.
    Author: Vasiliadis HM, Collet JP, Penrod JR, Ferraro P, Poirier C.
    Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Sep; 24(9):1275-83. PubMed ID: 16143245.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Life-threatening complications and expensive posttransplantation medical care raises the issue whether lung transplantation (L-Tx) is cost effective. We studied, from a health care system perspective, the cost effectiveness (C/E) and cost utility (C/U) of L-Tx in a Canadian setting. METHODS: An incremental C/E and C/U analysis of L-Tx, compared with the waiting list (WL), was carried out on 124 patients accepted into the Quebec L-Tx WL (1997-2001). Survival was presented in mean life-years (LYs). Utility, assessed with the standard gamble, was used in computing the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Different person-time experiences were simulated. Costs (95% confidence interval), in US dollars, were discounted at 5%. RESULTS: The mean LYs and QALYs gained were 0.57 (0.36-0.78) and 0.62 (0.36-0.78), respectively. The cost per patient without Tx was 1102 dollars (856 dollars-1348 dollars) per month. The L-Tx program induced a screening cost of 6208 dollars per patient. The cost of the L-Tx procedure (n = 91) was 31,815 dollars (25,301 dollars-44,816 dollars). The post-Tx cost per month in the first, second, third, and fourth year was 1809 dollars dollars (1187 dollars-2446 dollars), 1060 dollars (703 dollars-1478 dollars), 1128 dollars (519 dollars-1735 dollars), and 626 dollars (495 dollars-758 dollars), respectively. The projected C/E and C/U of the L-Tx program, assessed on the basis of pre- and post-Tx extrapolations, reached 40,048 dollars and 46,631 dollars, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: L-Tx in this Canadian setting yielded a benefit in mean LYs and QALYs gained. Although the program is expensive, the C/E and C/U ratios for some patient groups prove to be an acceptable cost for the benefits observed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]