These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: NT-proBNP in the differential diagnosis of acute dyspnea in the emergency department.
    Author: Zaninotto M, Mion M, Altinier S, Pastorello M, Rocco S, Tosato F, Iliceto S, Plebani M.
    Journal: Clin Biochem; 2005 Nov; 38(11):1041-4. PubMed ID: 16143322.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to verify the usefulness of NT-proBNP in the differential diagnosis of dyspnea in a population of patients presenting in the ER with breathlessness. DESIGN AND METHODS: In samples from 122 patients presenting in the ER with acute-severe dyspnea and from 25 subjects enrolled as a "comparison group" (NORM), NT-proBNP levels were measured. Patients have been classified on the basis of discharge diagnosis: pulmonary disease (PD, n = 23), pulmonary concomitant to cardiac disease (MIXED, n = 17), pulmonary embolism (EMB, n = 8), cardiac disease (CARD, n = 56), acute myocardial infarction (AMI, n = 11) and other disease (OTHER, n = 7). RESULTS: A significant difference in NT-proBNP values (P <or= 0.05) was found in CARD vs. PD as well as vs. NORM and OTHER groups. 1760 ng/L was the best cut-off value calculated from ROC analysis (AUC +/- SE 0.815 +/- 0.041). Comparing NT-proBNP values and ER diagnosis, a disagreement in 24 patients was observed. Using the discharge diagnosis as the "gold standard," four cases (17%) were found to be FP and 11 cases (46%) were FN according to ER diagnosis, while 2 patients showed false positive and 7 false negative NT-proBNP values. CONCLUSIONS: NT-proBNP measurement represents a useful biochemical tool helping the ER physician in the rapid and reliable recognition of cardiac involvement in patients presenting in the ER with acute-severe dyspnea.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]