These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Laparoscopic suture uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for uterine prolapse]. Author: Liang ZQ, Xu HC, Chen Y, Xiong GW, Chang Q, Zhang QY, He W. Journal: Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Oct; 39(10):666-8. PubMed ID: 16144562. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate possibility and effect of laparoscopic suture uterosacral ligament hysteropexy or colpopexy for women with uterine prolapse. METHODS: Thirty-two women with symptomatic uterine prolapse underwent laparoscopic suture uterosacral ligament hysteropexy. At the laparoscopic suture hysteropexy or colpopexy, the pouch of Douglas was closed and the uterosacral ligaments were plicated and reattached to the cervix. All patients were multipara and menopausal with prolapse of anterior wall of vagina. Additionally, 4 patients were with prolapse of posterior wall of vagina, 15 with stress urinary incontinence, and 4 with myomas. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically. The mean operating time for the laparoscopic suture hysteropexy or colpopexy alone was (32 +/- 11) min (range 20 approximately 80 min), and the mean blood loss was less than 50 ml. After a mean follow-up of (12 +/- 6) months (range 4 approximately 28 months), 23 women had no symptoms of uterine prolapse and seven had no objective evidence of uterine prolapse. Two women presented recurrence of uterine prolapse 3 months after operation. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopy suture hysteropexy or colpopexy is effective and safe in the management of symptomatic uterine prolapse. It may be an appropriate procedure for women with uterine prolapse hoping for uterine preservation.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]