These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A comparison of induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus spontaneous of labor in grand multiparous women. Author: Zamzami TY. Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Dec; 273(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 16160873. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of labor in grand multiparous women (para 6 or more) who had induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2 with grand multiparous women in spontaneous labor. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed, 202 grand multiparous women were induced labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2 and compared with outcomes with grand multiparous women who entered in spontaneous labor and delivered during the same study period and served as control group. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the duration of labor, fetal birth weight, use of oxytocin augmentation, and Apgar scores in the two groups. Fourteen women (6.9%) in the induction group delivered by cesarean section compared to six woman (3.0%) in the control group. This was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.01). In the induction group, the mean duration of the hospital stay was longer (P = 0.003) and there was one neonatal fetal death and one uterus rupture. CONCLUSION: Induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2 in grand multiparous women is still relatively safe.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]