These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Nesiritide utilization evaluation in a university teaching hospital.
    Author: Cheng JW, Merl MY, Nguyen HM, Caliendo GC, Meyers J.
    Journal: J Clin Pharm Ther; 2005 Oct; 30(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 16164491.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nesiritide is a new vasodilator approved for decompensated heart failure (DHF). Compared with nitroglycerin, nesiritide improves haemodynamics and symptoms in the first 3 h of therapy. However, nesiritide is more expensive than nitroglycerin (US$380-1500 daily vs. US$2-5 daily). Since its approval in the US in late 2001, nesiritide use has increased dramatically in our institution. Nesiritide has become a focus of our multidisciplinary drug utilization initiative, aimed at performing a nesiritide utilization evaluation (NUE) and developing a nesiritide usage guideline. METHODS: Medical records of patients who received nesiritide from 1 October 2003 to 31 March 2004 were reviewed. Nesiritide utilization pattern was presented to the initiative group for guideline development. RESULTS: A total of 162 records were reviewed. A 22.6% of inappropriate usage was reported. The most significant inappropriate usage was in patients who received the agent for precardiac valvular surgery optimization, followed by those for diuresis in non-cardiac-related fluid overload states. The median duration of nesiritide therapy was 6 days (range 1-94). The median length of stay (LOS) in our institution was 14 days (National statistics DHF LOS: 5.3 days). Eliminating inappropriate nesiritide usage can lead to a potential of US$141 886 savings per year. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, a 48-h nesiritide restriction policy was implemented. Usage beyond 48 h requires Heart Failure Service approval. Future NUE will evaluate the effectiveness of this policy. The overall management of DHF also needs to be evaluated to improve efficiency of care.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]