These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Hybrid Capture 2 vs HPV Consensus kit: comparison of 2 assays for human papillomavirus detection and typing]. Author: Hantz S, Caly H, Decroisette E, Fermeaux V, Bakeland D, Pascal B, Darreye G, Dussartre C, Rogez S, Aubard Y, Denis F, Alain S. Journal: Pathol Biol (Paris); 2005; 53(8-9):556-62. PubMed ID: 16176861. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Many laboratories use the DNA Hybrid Capture 2 HPV-high risk assay (Digene) to detect and type oncogenic HPV. The aim of this work was to compare this assay with a new HPV genotyping assay: HPV Consensus kit (Argène). Actually, this assay is not commercially available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-four cervical samples were tested with both the routine assay Hybrid Capture 2 and the HPV Consensus kit. Discordant results were analysed by amplification with a nested PCR and sequencing of amplified products. RESULTS: Only 81 results could be analysed concerning the oncogenic risk. The overall concordance was 92,6%. But we find 13 "generic" results with the HPV Consensus kit, the generic probe including high risk and low risk genotypes. CONCLUSION: HPV Consensus kit results showed a better detection sensitivity for this assay than Hybrid Capture 2 assay. Nevertheless, "generic" results give no information about the oncogenic risk of the HPV detected in a sample.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]