These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Significance of eosinophilia after stem cell transplantation as a possible prognostic marker for favorable outcome. Author: Sato T, Kobayashi R, Nakajima M, Iguchi A, Ariga T. Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant; 2005 Dec; 36(11):985-91. PubMed ID: 16184178. Abstract: Although eosinophilia after stem cell transplantation (SCT) has been addressed in recent reports, the significance of eosinophilia in disease outcome after SCT has not been well studied. In this study, we investigate the frequency of eosinophilia after SCT to determine its prognostic value. The subjects were 113 patients with malignant or nonmalignant diseases who underwent SCT treatment. In these patients, eosinophilia was detected in 44 cases (38.9%), on average 67.5 days after transplantation, and the mean maximum absolute eosinophil count was 840.5 x 10(6)/l. To study the basis of eosinophilia after SCT, various serum cytokine levels during SCT in patients both with and without eosinophilia were analyzed. Statistical analysis indicated that the overall patient survival rates improved in those with eosinophilia compared to those without eosinophilia (88.7 vs 43.0%, P=0.0034). In particular, in patients with malignant diseases, those with eosinophilia showed a higher event-free survival (81.1 vs 44.6%, P=0.0025) and a lower relapse rate (16.0 vs 43.0%, P=0.0287) than those without eosinophilia. In conclusion, we propose that eosinophilia after SCT could be a useful prognostic marker for determining favorable outcomes in patients with malignant diseases. The reasons for this good prognosis in SCT patients with eosinophilia are discussed.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]