These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Clinical evaluation of radiofrequency ablation therapy in patients with hepatic cavernous hemangiomas].
    Author: Fan RF, Chai FL, He GX, Li RZ, Wan WX, Bai MD, Zhu WK, Cao ML, Li HM, Yan SZ.
    Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jun 22; 85(23):1608-12. PubMed ID: 16185527.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy in patients with hepatic cavernous hemangioma (HCH) and investigate its optimal operative approach. METHODS: Between March 2001 and June 2004, a total of 68 patients, 18 males and 50 females, age 43.1 (30-64), with 104 HCHs 2.5-11 cm in diameter with the mean size of 5.6 cm, were treated by ultrasound-guided RFA, via percutaneous (n = 19), laparoscopic (n = 29), or open surgical (n = 20) approach. In 7 patients with hepatic lesions larger than 7 cm in diameter, Pringle maneuver was used to occlude the hepatic blood flow during the laparoscopic and open RFA therapy. All patients were followed up with helical computed tomographic (CT) scans and ultrasonography for 19 months (6-36 months). RESULTS: Additional intrahepatic lesions not detected preoperatively were found in 2 patients (with 2 new lesions) via laparoscopy and 3 patients (with 4 new lesions) via celiotomy. All patients were treated with RFA successfully. The mean blood loss in the Pringle group (90.0 ml +/- 22.4 ml) was significantly fewer than that in the non-Pringle group (249 ml +/- 56 ml) (P < 0.01). The mean RFA time per lesion in the Pringle group (29.0 min +/- 7.5 min) was shorter markedly compared to the non-Pringle group (55.4 min +/- 12.4 min) (P < 0.01). In the laparoscopic RFA group, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed simultaneously in 15 patients with chronic calculous cholecystitis and in another 2 patients because of tumors abutting the gallbladders, and laparoscopic fenestration with intraperitoneal drainage was performed in 3 patients with simple hepatic cysts. In the open RFA group, cholecystectomy was performed in 5 patients with gallbladder diseases, partial cystectomy was performed in one patient with a hepatic cyst, and choledochotomy was performed in 3 patients with common bile duct stones. Postoperative fever and abnormal serum transaminase (ALT and AST) levels were observed in 29 patients (42.6%). A transient hematuria occurred in one patient after open RFA. No specific complications developed during or after RFA. The follow-up showed a complete lesion necrosis rate of 99% (103/104). One patient showed an incomplete lesion necrosis in the margin of RFA site 6 months after percutaneous RFA therapy and obtained retreatment with percutaneous RFA. CONCLUSION: RFA therapy is a safe, feasible and effective treatment options for patients with HCHs. This procedure can be performed via percutaneous, laparoscopic, or open approach. To prevent the RFA-related complications and to increase the therapeutic efficacy of RFA, the choice of optimal operative approach should be based on the lesion size, number, and location and on the patient's clinical status. Hepatic inflow occlusion by Pringle maneuver during laparoscopic or open RFA therapy can reduce the blood loss and increase the therapeutic efficacy significantly.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]