These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of a method of simulating reduced frequency selectivity.
    Author: Moore BC, Glasberg BR, Simpson A.
    Journal: J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3402-23. PubMed ID: 1619117.
    Abstract:
    The accuracy of a method of simulating reduced frequency selectivity by the spectral smearing of complex stimuli has been evaluated. First an excitation pattern that would be evoked by a given nonsmeared stimulus in an impaired ear with broad auditory filters was estimated. Then the spectral smearing of the stimulus that would be necessary to create the same excitation pattern in a normal ear was calculated. The smearing was based on the shapes of simulated broad auditory filters; both symmetric and asymmetric broad filters were simulated. The method was used to process notched noise, and tones in notched noise, and the processed stimuli were used in a series of experiments with normally hearing subjects measuring the threshold for the tone in notched noise. The resulting data were used to derive auditory filter shapes. The derived filter shapes were generally similar to the expected shapes (based on the type of spectral smearing used), but there were some systematic discrepancies and some individual differences. The discrepancies do not seem to be due to the use of information derived from phase locking, since they were observed both at 1 kHz (where phase locking occurs) and at 6 kHz (where phase locking probably does not occurs). The discrepancies also do not seem to be due to the transmission characteristics of the outer/middle ear, since they occurred both when these characteristics were taken into account in the fitting procedure, and when the stimuli were preshaped to compensate for these characteristics. The influence of the subjects' own auditory filters probably can explain some of the discrepancies; the excitation pattern evoked by the spectrally smeared stimuli can be significantly influenced by the subjects' own filters when those filters are not much sharper than the simulated filters used to produce the smeared stimuli. Finally, some of the discrepancies can probably be explained by subjects combining information across auditory filters, rather than just using the single 'best' filter in each condition; this represents a limitation of the fitting procedure rather than of the simulation itself. Overall, the simulation worked reasonably well, especially when the smearing was based on symmetric filters.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]