These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effectiveness of diuretic injection on the measurement of differential renal function using Tc-99m DMSA in patients with a dilated renal pelvis.
    Author: Buyukdereli G, Guney IB, Seydaoglu G.
    Journal: Clin Nucl Med; 2005 Nov; 30(11):721-4. PubMed ID: 16237293.
    Abstract:
    AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of diuretic injection for the measurement of differential renal function (DRF) with technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (Tc-99m DMSA) scintigraphy in patients with a dilated pelvis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 46 patients who were referred for both technetium-99m-L,L-ethylenedicysteine (Tc-99m L,L-EC) and Tc-99m DMSA imaging and found to have a dilated collecting system on Tc-99m EC scintigraphy were studied. Four to 5 hours after intravenous injection of Tc-99m DMSA, imaging was performed in the supine position, and posterior, anterior, left and right lateral, and left and right posterior oblique views were taken. After this study, furosemide was administered intravenously and 30 minutes later, additional images in the anterior and posterior views were obtained. RESULTS: The kidneys were evaluated into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 12 kidneys that had an obstructive curve pattern on Tc-99m EC scans. Group 2 comprised 34 kidneys that had a nonobstructive dilated renogram curve pattern. DRF of the kidneys in each patient were calculated, and the values obtained from the standard and diuretic DMSA scans were compared with each other for all patients and each group. Considering all the patients, the values of mean DRF on both standard and diuretic DMSA images were 55.4%+/-21.2% and 55.4%+/-21.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences between DRF values of each kidney obtained by the 2 methods. When we compared the DRF values in groups 1 and 2, there were again no significant differences. In group 1, the values of mean DRF on standard and diuretic images were 51.7%+/-13.7% and 51.6%+/-13.9%, respectively, and in group 2, the values of mean DRF were 56.7%+/-23.4% and 56.7%+/-23.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In view of our study, diuretic administration seems to be an unnecessary intervention because it has no effect on the accuracy of DRF measurements using DMSA scintigraphy in patients with a dilated collecting system whether it is obstructed or not.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]