These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparison of different housing systems for laying hens in respect to economic, health and welfare parameters with special regard to organized cages (literature review)].
    Author: Vits A, Weitzenbürger D, Distl O.
    Journal: Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2005 Sep; 112(9):332-42. PubMed ID: 16240912.
    Abstract:
    In conventional cages laying hens are subjected to restricted movement and a lack of ability to fulfil most of their natural behaviours. Thus, welfare and health of laying hens can be highly limited in conventional cages. Due to the rising criticism of conventional cages the EU passed a directive in 1999 (CEC, 1999) in order to ban conventional cages by the beginning of 2012. Because of this decision alternative housing systems like floor pens, aviaries or free range systems will gain importance in the future. In these housing systems laying hens have the opportunity to live out their natural behaviours to a higher extent. But also alternative housing systems have some disadvantages. Frequent infections leading to higher mortalities can be detected. Besides that egg production in alternative systems is often not so high and stable like in cages. Furnished cages and small-group-systems represent the attempt to retain the high economic and hygiene standards of conventional cages, while offering the hens the possibility to exercise and fulfil some of their natural behaviours. With regard to productivity, egg quality and bone strength this attempt seems to function, whereas keel bone deformities and the lack of ability to live out natural behaviours are still problems in furnished cages.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]