These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of shift estimation strategies in spectral elastography.
    Author: Hoyt K, Forsberg F, Ophir J.
    Journal: Ultrasonics; 2006 Jan; 44(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 16243373.
    Abstract:
    This paper compares the performance of various spectral shift estimators for use in spectral elastography, namely, the normalized cross-correlation (NCC), sum squared difference (SSD) and sum absolute difference (SAD). Simulation and experimental results demonstrate that the spectral SSD-based elastographic method exhibits no marked difference in performance compared to the more computationally costly NCC-based approach, which has conventionally been the preferred estimator in spectral elastography. The spectral SAD-based strain estimator, despite being computationally less burdening, failed to exhibit performance comparable to that of the NCC- and SSD-based techniques. Furthermore, though spectral subsample estimation techniques using a cosine-fit interpolation method outperformed that of the parabolic-fit method in terms of both reduced bias errors and standard deviations, the latter was analyzed in this study due to computational simplicity. The role of spectral density was evaluated without and with parabolic-based subsample interpolation. Based on minimizing computational complexity, it is concluded that a (low density) spectral SSD strain estimator coupled with parabolic-based subsample estimation is the preferred choice for spectral elastography.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]