These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Hyperthermic injury versus crush injury in the rat sciatic nerve: a comparative functional, histopathological and morphometrical study.
    Author: Hoogeveen JF, Troost D, Wondergem J, van der Kracht AH, Haveman J.
    Journal: J Neurol Sci; 1992 Mar; 108(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 1624953.
    Abstract:
    Functional and morphological changes of the rat sciatic nerve after local hyperthermia (30 min, 45 degrees C) and crush treatment were compared. After hyperthermic injury nerve function loss developed in a time period of about 7 h. Nerve crush led to an immediate loss of nerve function. Nerve function loss was assessed by a motor and a sensory function test. Recovery from function loss took place in both treatment groups and was complete in 4-5 weeks. Early (within 8 h post-treatment) histopathological changes in the nerve after heating included edema, possible blood stasis and changes in the blood vessel wall, like swelling of the media. During this period some axonal changes were observed. Immediate after crushing axons were severely damaged, while many blood vessels remained normal. Within one week after both treatments, degeneration of axons and myelin was observed at the site and distal from the site of the lesion (Wallerian degeneration). Three weeks after treatment a major part of the axons had regenerated and remyelinated. Vascular changes at the site of lesion could still be observed in the heat-treated nerves. Twelve weeks after both treatments, blood vessels appeared to be normal again. Morphometrical analysis of the treated nerves confirmed the histological observations. Three and 12 weeks after treatment average axon diameters were significant smaller and average myelin sheaths were significant thinner compared to untreated nerves. These parameters did not differ significantly when the two treatment groups were compared.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]