These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical correlates of CES-D depressive symptom ratings in an MS population.
    Author: Patten SB, Lavorato DH, Metz LM.
    Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 2005; 27(6):439-45. PubMed ID: 16271659.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: In multiple sclerosis (MS), depression rating scales may be used as case-finding instruments for depressive disorders, but depressive symptom ratings may have clinical implications beyond their case-finding role. The objective of this analysis was to explore this possibility by carrying out descriptive analyses of symptom ratings obtained using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Rating Scale (CES-D) in an MS clinic population. METHOD: The analysis used cross-sectional baseline data collected from 589 subjects enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Data collection included demographic and clinical information including Extended Disability Status Scale ratings, a 54-item MS Quality of Life Scale and the Fatigue Impact Scale. RESULTS: Across a spectrum of CES-D scores, correlations with other health indicators were observed. Depressive symptoms were higher in more disabled subjects. CES-D scores were correlated with the emotional well-being dimension of quality of life and with a social fatigue impact dimension. Alternative scoring of the CES-D had a negligible impact on the pattern of correlation. CONCLUSIONS: CES-D ratings appear to be interpretable beyond the traditional yes/no categorization used in case finding. CES-D ratings are predictive of other clinical parameters in domains relevant to mental health.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]