These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ: an evolving approach at the University of Florida.
    Author: Camp R, Feezor R, Kasraeian A, Cendan J, Schell S, Wilkinson E, Copeland E, Lind S.
    Journal: Breast J; 2005; 11(6):394-7. PubMed ID: 16297082.
    Abstract:
    While sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has virtually replaced axillary dissection as the initial diagnostic procedure for invasive breast cancer, the role of SLNB in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with SLNB in DCIS. All patients with DCIS or DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) who underwent SLNB from June 1997 to April 2002 at the University of Florida were included for analysis. The indications for SLNB were at the discretion of the treating surgeon. Lymphatic mapping involved a sequential dermal-peritumoral radiocolloid injection and dynamic lymphoscintigraphy followed by an intraoperative assessment of radioactivity with a handheld gamma probe. All sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) with radioactive counts>or=10% of the ex vivo counts of the most radioactive SLN were removed. Pathologic analysis consisted of slicing the SLN at 2 mm intervals for permanent section. All paraffin blocks of the SLNs were step sectioned in 4 microm sections (92 microm spacing) through the entire lymph node. Slides were then stained with an immunohistochemical stain for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) and evaluated by microscopy. Nodal metastases were classified using the 6th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual. From April 1998 to April 2002, 43 patients with DCIS underwent SLNB at the University of Florida. Seven patients (16%) with multifocal or extensive DCIS (five patients) or DCISM (two patients) who underwent SLNB had a positive sentinel node. Two of the three patients considered positive by immunohistochemistry alone had either DCISM or invasive disease. Four (80%) of the five patients with extensive DCIS and a positive sentinel node were ultimately determined to have invasive or microinvasive disease. While SLNB remains controversial in DCIS, our data suggest that patients with extensive DCIS should undergo SLNB at the initial procedure to avoid the need for a second operation. Data from clinical trials are needed to determine the impact of SLNB results on overall survival in patients with DCIS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]