These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A simple and rapid chromatographic strip test for detection of antibody to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.
    Author: Lyoo YS, Kleiboeker SB, Jang KY, Shin NK, Kang JM, Kim CH, Lee SJ, Sur JH.
    Journal: J Vet Diagn Invest; 2005 Sep; 17(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 16312241.
    Abstract:
    Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) continues to be a major economic problem for swine industries worldwide despite several disease-reduction strategies such as age-segregated early weaning and all-in-all-out pig movement. Routine diagnosis of PRRSV is carried out by the combined use of an antibody-detecting enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunofluorescence, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and virus isolation. These assays require specialized laboratory equipment in addition to multistep sample handling and sample preparation. The objective of this study was to evaluate a simple pen-side assay (BioSign PRRSV) for rapid detection of PRRSV antibody based on a lateral flow chromatographic strip immunoassay system. This assay uses Escherichia coli-expressed viral nucleocapsid protein antigen for detecting antibodies against PRRSV in swine sera. In this report, the authors describe the evaluation of this assay using sera from both clinical samples and experimentally infected piglets. The results were compared with those of a standard, commercially available antibody ELISA (HerdChek PRRS ELISA) and an indirect immunofluorescence assay using the same serum samples. The BioSign PRRSV assay was capable of detecting antibodies in sera known to contain antibodies to PRRSV, resulting in 93.2% sensitivity for samples from experimentally infected pigs and 98.7% sensitivity for clinical serum samples. For sera that did not contain antibodies to PRRSV, the specificity was found to be 98.5% and 99.2% for clinical and experimental serum samples, respectively.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]