These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A simple different method to use proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) for measuring mitral valve area. Author: Uzun M, Baysan O, Erinc K, Ozkan M, Sag C, Genc C, Karaeren H, Yokusoglu M, Isik E. Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2005 Dec; 21(6):633-40. PubMed ID: 16322923. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Angle-correction is an important limiting factor for using proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method in measuring mitral valve area (MVA). In this study, we derived a novel formula, which simplifies the angle-correction, and tested its use in patients with mitral stenosis (MS). METHODS: The study included 30 MS patients without concomitant aortic or mitral regurgitation. We used mathematical equations and established a relation between the angle and its corresponding border, 'a', by using linear regression analysis. It was found that MVA is equal to [(1.11*a2 + 0.95)* r2 (Val/Vmax)]. We compared this formula with plain angle-corrected and solid angle-corrected PISA methods, planimetry (reference method) and pressure-half time method by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: All methods were in significant relation with the reference method, two-dimensional planimetry. We found that there is a good relation between our method and planimetry (r = 0.79, p < 0.001), pressure half-time method (r = 0.85, p < 0.001), angle-corrected PISA method (r = 0.99, p < 0.001), and solid angle-corrected PISA method (r = 0.88, p < 0.001). The time duration of the new method was shorter (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our method is an easy way for applying angle-corrected PISA method to mitral valve area measurement in patients with mitral stenosis. Absence of the need for estimating the angle is the major advantage.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]