These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [The surgeon's role as expert witness in malpractice lawsuits. Purpose and requirements of legal medical opinions].
    Author: Bauch J, Meier J, Ulsenheimer K.
    Journal: Chirurg; 2005 Dec; 76(12):1185-97; quiz 1198-9. PubMed ID: 16323031.
    Abstract:
    Even experienced medical advisors need clear guidelines on the extent and form of expert opinions presented to courts of law. The importance of thorough document study, correctly organizing findings, and carefully weighing the various factors influencing an opinion cannot be stressed enough. Presented here is a sample opinion for German civil court trials at the state level. It illustrates how best to combine research and clinical results, personal professional experience, and citations from the literature to structure legally valid evidence in the form of an expert opinion. The importance of cogent response to examiners' and cross-examiners' questions is demonstrated, as are differences between civil and criminal proceedings. An appendix cites the appropriate passages from the German legal code concerning remuneration for expert opinions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]