These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits.
    Author: Vieland VJ, Hodge SE, Greenberg DA.
    Journal: Genet Epidemiol; 1992; 9(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 1634106.
    Abstract:
    When a disease is controlled by two or more mendelian loci acting epistatically, it can be modeled in a linkage analysis as a single-locus mendelian disease with reduced penetrance. However, the reliability of such an approximation has not yet been demonstrated. This study evaluates the adequacy of such single-locus approximations, when the disease under investigation is determined by two loci, one of which is tightly linked to a genetic marker. A wide range of two-locus models were simulated, and analyzed under both the correct two-locus model and under a single-locus approximation to that model. In general, the single-locus approximations yielded lod scores very close to the correct ones, but estimates of theta tended to be upwardly biased. We conclude that a single-locus linkage analysis will, in general, provide an excellent approximation to a correct (two-locus) linkage analysis of epistatic two-locus diseases. This enables researchers to continue to use single-locus linkage analyses when two-locus disease transmission is a possibility, and it validates linkage findings already obtained under single-locus analysis, even if the disease under investigation proves ultimately to be governed by two mendelian loci. We also examine alternative methods for obtaining parameter estimates for the single-locus approximations, and we discuss both generalizations and limitations of our findings.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]