These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Use of Monte Carlo simulation to assess the pharmacodynamics of beta-lactams against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in children: a report from the OPTAMA program.
    Author: Ellis JM, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP.
    Journal: Clin Ther; 2005 Nov; 27(11):1820-30. PubMed ID: 16368453.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Assessing the likelihood of achieving bactericidal pharmacodynamic exposures against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with intravenous antimicrobial regimens would provide insights into the selection of empiric therapy in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to use pharmacodynamic modeling to determine the likelihood of various pediatric antibiotic regimens achieving bactericidal exposures against P aeruginosa in children. METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for meropenem (20 and 40 mg/kg q8h), imipenem (15 and 25 mg/kg q6h), ceftazidime (50 mg/kg q8h), cefepime (50 mg/kg q8h), and piperacillin/tazobactam (75 mg/kg q6h) against P aeruginosa isolates from 2 pediatric institutions. A 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was performed to predict attainment of pharmacodynamic targets against P aeruginosa for each of these regimens in a population of 10-year-olds. Optimal regimens were defined as those that had a > or =90% likelihood of attaining target exposures. RESULTS: At institution 1, high-dose imipenem, high-dose meropenem, and ceftazidime achieved bactericidal pharmacodynamic exposures (likelihood of target attainment: 94%, 92%, and 92%, respectively). No other regimen was associated with a high probability of attaining bactericidal exposure (low-dose imipenem, 87%; cefepime, 85%; low-dose meropenem, 84%; piperacillin/tazobactam, 60%). At institution 2, no regimen was associated with a high likelihood of attaining bactericidal exposure; the calculated probabilities were cefepime, 78%; ceftazidime, 65%; high-dose meropenem, 58%; high-dose imipenem, 57%; low-dose imipenem, 54%; low-dose meropenem, 47%; and piperacillin/tazobactam, 47%. A lack of agreement between attainment of bactericidal exposures and percent susceptibility was apparent for many of the regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Few regimens demonstrated a high likelihood of achieving bactericidal exposures against P aeruginosa at these institutions. Importantly, percent susceptibility overestimated attainment of the bactericidal target for some regimens, suggesting that further study is necessary in pediatric patients. The findings of this study highlight differences in target attainment and MIC distributions between institutions, emphasizing the importance of using institution-specific data when selecting empiric antimicrobial therapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]