These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluating the responsiveness of 2 versions of the gross motor function measure for children with cerebral palsy.
    Author: Wang HY, Yang YH.
    Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 87(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 16401438.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the responsiveness to motor change of the original version of Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) and its second version (GMFM-66) in children with cerebral palsy (CP). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Seven rehabilitation pediatric clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five children with CP (age range, 0.5-9.4y; mean, 3.7+/-1.9y) were recruited. INTERVENTION: The children's motor ability was assessed twice with a mean interval of 3.5 months using all of the GMFM-88 items. A 3-category range of therapist judgments on the children's meaningful motor improvement was used as an external standard. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: GMFM-88 scores, GMFM-66 scores, and therapists' judgments. RESULTS: Regarding the association with the therapist judgments, the overall responsiveness of GMFM-66 is superior to that of GMFM-88. Both measures' sensitivities of the responsiveness are similar, but GMFM-66 has better specificity. CONCLUSIONS: To evaluate the motor change in a sample of children with CP over a mean interval of 3.5 months by using the 2 versions of GMFM, the GMFM-66 was more responsive than the GMFM-88 with respect to consistency with therapist clinically meaningful judgments.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]