These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effects of prosthetic foot design on physiologic measurements, self-selected walking velocity, and physical activity in people with transtibial amputation.
    Author: Hsu MJ, Nielsen DH, Lin-Chan SJ, Shurr D.
    Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 16401450.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the physiologic differences during multispeed treadmill walking and physical activity profiles for the Otto Bock C-Walk foot (C-Walk), Flex-Foot, and solid ankle cushion heel (SACH) foot in people with transtibial amputation. DESIGN: A repeated-measures design with 3 prostheses. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eight men with unilateral transtibial amputation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physiologic responses (energy expenditure, gait efficiency, exercise intensity, rating of perceived exertion [RPE]) during multispeed treadmill walking (53.64, 67.05, 80.46, 93.87, 107.28 m/min) test were analyzed with 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). One-way ANOVA was employed to analyze foot-type differences for self-selected walking velocity (SSWV), and steps per day (daily activity). Analysis of covariance was used to analyze foot-type differences with SSWV as the covariable for the physiologic measurements. RESULTS: The C-Walk had a trend of improved physiologic responses compared with the SACH; however, no foot-type differences were statistically significant. Compared with the C-Walk and SACH, the Flex-Foot showed no significant differences in energy expenditure and gait efficiency, but significantly lower percentage of age-predicted maximum heart rate and RPE values. CONCLUSIONS: The energy storing-releasing feet appeared to have certain trends of improved gait performance compared with the SACH; however, not many objective foot-type differences were significantly noted. Further studies with a larger sample size are suggested.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]