These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Twin delivery: a survey of French obstetrical policies].
    Author: Vendittelli F, Rivière O, Pons JC, Lémery D, Berrebi A, Mamelle N, Obstétriciens du réseau sentinelle Audipog.
    Journal: Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Jan; 34(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 16406658.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To describe obstetrical policy variations concerning the delivery management in the case of twins, at term. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A mail survey was undertaken among the medical supervisors of the maternity wards belonging to the AUDIPOG Network (N=170). RESULTS: The participating rate was 73.35%. 124 answers were analysed. Elective caesarean was realized by 0.8% of participants for diamniotic twins and by 57% of cases for monamniotic twins An elective caesarean is planned for respectively 74% of answers if first (J1) and second twin (J2) are in a breech presentation, 81% if J1 is in breech and J2 in cephalic presentation, and 68% if J1 is in breech and J2 in transverse presentation. Delivery with J1 in breech and J2 in cephalic presentation had a higher risk than a delivery of a single breech at term. When J1 and J2 had a breech presentation 73% of participants thought that this delivery is more difficult than a delivery of a single breech at term. However, they were only 17.5% to consider that a delivery of twin with J1 in cephalic and J2 in breech presentation had a higher risk than a single breech delivery. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Medical policy variations are not extensive except for X-ray pelvimetry and the presence for the delivery of one paediatrician and one anaesthesiologist. An elective caesarean policy for twins is infrequent in France.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]