These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Relevance of frequent mu-opioid receptor polymorphisms for opioid activity in healthy volunteers. Author: Lötsch J, Geisslinger G. Journal: Pharmacogenomics J; 2006; 6(3):200-10. PubMed ID: 16415919. Abstract: Polymorphisms in the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) are primary candidate sources of clinical variability in opioid therapy. Apart from the 118A>G single nucleotide polymorphism, nothing is known about the role of OPRM1 mutations in opioid therapy. The influence of the OPRM1 mutations on opioid pharmacodynamics was assessed in pooled data from 31 healthy volunteers obtained in previous studies with available plasma concentrations and pupil diameters after intravenous administration of morphine or morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). A total of 24 candidate ORPM1 mutations were screened for and those found at an allelic frequency of at least 5% in the 31 subjects were analyzed for functional consequences, using population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the miotic effects of the opioids as a reliable and sensitive surrogate parameter of the central nervous opioid effects. Polymorphisms at an allelic frequency of > or =5% (n=310) were 118A>G in exon 1 (11.5%), the IVS2-31G>A (8.9%) and IVS2-691C>G (44.5%) SNPs in intron 2. The 118A>G SNP significantly increased the values of EC50 by a factor of more than 2 (non-mutated: EC50,morphine=30 nmol/l, EC50,M6G=750 nmol/l, 118G carriers: EC50,morphine=66 nmol/l, EC50,M6G=1650 nmol/l), whereas the IVS2-691C>G SNP had no effect. Based on morphine and M6G, the present analysis encourages focusing on the 118A>G SNP when investigating the role of OPRM1 mutations for the activity of opioid analgesics. Other OPRM1 mutations are probably less important either owing to low allelic frequency or due to poor indications for functional consequences. This applies to opioid potency in the context of opioid therapy but not to pain processing or substance addiction, in which opioid receptors are involved but other or additional OPRM1 mutations may be important.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]