These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of photoperiod length on body mass and testicular growth in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) and brahminy myna (Sturnus pagodarum).
    Author: Bhardwaj SK, Anushi N.
    Journal: Reprod Nutr Dev; 2006; 46(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 16438917.
    Abstract:
    Two experiments studied the relative effects on body mass and testicular growth of stimulatory photoperiods applied simultaneously to two photosensitive species, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) and brahminy myna (Sturnus pagodarum). Experiment 1 on the house sparrow consisted of two parts. In experiment 1A, beginning on 24 March 2002, short day pretreated sparrows were exposed for 12 weeks to 13L: 11D (13 h light: 11 h darkness), 20L: 4D and NDL (control). Experiment 1B was similar to 1A except that it used sparrows that were not treated with short days. This experiment was repeated at three different times in the year. Beginning on 29 December 2002 (for 24 weeks), 26 March 2003 (for 12 weeks) and 16 August 2003 (for 8 weeks), sparrows captured from the wild and acclimated to captive condition for 1 week were exposed to 13L: 11D and 20L: 4D. Each time, a group was maintained in NDL and served as the control. Experiment 2 was performed on myna and used an identical protocol. Beginning on 24 March 2002, myna that were captured from the wild and acclimated to captivity conditions were exposed for 16 weeks to 13L: 11D and 20L: 4D; a group was maintained in NDL and served as the control. There was photostimulation and subsequent regression of the testes on all day lengths except in the August group of experiment 1B. The effect on body mass was variable. Interestingly, however, the response to 20L:4D was relatively smaller as compared to 13L:11D. Taken together, these results confirm that the two species use photoperiods in control of their reproductive cycle, and tend to indicate that exposure to unnatural long photoperiods may in fact be unfavorable and could compromise gonadal growth and development.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]