These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Time of death dependent criteria in vitreous humor: accuracy of estimating the time since death.
    Author: Madea B, Rödig A.
    Journal: Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Dec 20; 164(2-3):87-92. PubMed ID: 16439082.
    Abstract:
    Since more than 40 years reports on the rise of potassium concentration [K(+)] in vitreous humor have been published with different statements concerning the accuracy of death time estimation. In the last years several statistical approaches for a more accurate estimation of the time since death have been reported. While in most investigations the PMI has been used as the independent and [K(+)] as the dependent variable in linear regression analysis between PMI and [K(+)], recently it has been suggested to use [K(+)] as the independent variable for regression analysis. Changing the variables would lead to a higher accuracy of death time estimation. This has also been recommended for regression analysis between hypoxanthine concentration [Hx] and time since death. This hypothesis has been checked on independent cases with potassium and hypoxanthine in vitreous humor. Linear regression with [K(+)] or [Hx] as independent variable has revealed a slightly more accurate death time estimation compared to a linear regression with PMI as independent variable. Thus, e.g. the accuracy could have been improved from +/-25.96 to +/- 23.27h by using [K(+)] as independent variable. Another statistical approach has re-evaluated six large studies on the rise of vitreous [K(+)] using a local regression analysis (Loess procedure). Based on this re-evaluation an accuracy of death time estimation has been recommended (95% limits of confidence of +/-1h in the early PMI and +/-10h, 110h postmortem) which has surpassed even optimistic results of earlier investigations. This recommended accuracy of death time estimation has been checked on a random sample of 492 cases. Only 153 cases have been within the predicted postmortem interval, 339 lay outside with a systematic overestimation of the time since death.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]