These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Meta-analysis of the differences in the time to onset of action between rocuronium and vecuronium.
    Author: Nava-Ocampo AA, Velázquez-Armenta Y, Moyao-García D, Salmerón J.
    Journal: Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2006; 33(1-2):125-30. PubMed ID: 16445711.
    Abstract:
    1. The aim of the present study was to conduct a meta-analysis of the magnitude of differences in the onset of action (T(max)) between rocuronium and vecuronium. 2. A search was made in PubMed, EMBASE Drugs and Pharmacology, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Cochrane Database on Systematic Reviews. Studies comparing the T(max) at the adductor policies between rocuronium and vecuronium administered as an intravenous bolus were included in the study. Twenty-nine effect sizes obtained from 21 studies were included. 3. The result of the meta-analysis of differences was -57.9 s (95% confidence interval -71.4 to -44.3 s), favouring rocuronium over vecuronium. The smallest difference in T(max) between these neuromuscular-blocking agents was observed in children (-19.1 s). The difference in T(max) between rocuronium and vecuronium in female patients was -38.7 s. The difference in T(max) between rocuronium and vecuronium measured by electromyography was approximately 50% shorter than that determined by acceleromyography or mechanomyography. In a subanalysis between rocuronium 600 mg/kg versus vecuronium 100 mg/kg, the difference in T(max) between them was very similar to that obtained in the general meta-analysis. 4. According to subanalyses of patient age and sex, drug dose and neuromuscular monitoring systems, the T(max) of rocuronium was approximately 20-70 s faster than that of vecuronium.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]