These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Reactivity of FDA-approved anti-D reagents with partial D red blood cells.
    Author: Judd WJ, Moulds M, Schlanser G.
    Journal: Immunohematology; 2005; 21(4):146-8. PubMed ID: 16472014.
    Abstract:
    Individuals whose RBCs are characterized as having a partial D phenotype may make anti-D if exposed to normal D+ RBCs; thus it is desirable that they be typed as D- should they require blood transfusion or Rh immune globulin (RhIG) prophylaxis. Further, use of different anti-D reagents by blood centers and transfusion services can account for FDA-reportable errors. For this study, anti- D reagents for use in tube tests were obtained from three U.S. manufacturers. They included three examples of IgM monoclonal anti-D blended with monoclonal IgG anti-D, one IgM monoclonal anti-D blended with polyclonal IgG anti-D, and two reagents formulated with human anti-D in a high-protein diluent. One anti- D formulated for use by gel column technology was also tested. Direct agglutination tests by tube or gel were strongly positive (scores 9-12), with partial D RBCs of types DII, DIIIa, DIIIb, and DIVa. No reagent anti-D caused direct agglutination of DVI type 1, DVI type 2, or DFR phenotype RBCs. One tube anti-D reagent formulated with an IgM monoclonal anti-D plus a polyclonal IgG anti-D failed to cause direct agglutination of DVa, DBT, and R(0)(Har) RBCs, while DVa RBCs reacted weakly with two high-protein reagents formulated with human IgG anti-D. In contrast, the anti-D used by gel column technology was strongly reactive (score 11) with DVa, DBT, and R(0)(Har) RBCs. The single monoclonal IgM-polyclonal IgG blended anti-D and the two high-protein reagents were also the only reagents that failed to react with R(0)(Har) RBCs by the IAT. Elimination of the test for weak D on all patient samples, using currently available FDA-licensed reagents, will ensure that partial D category VI (DVI) patients will type as D- for the purpose of RhIG prophylaxis and blood transfusion. However, RBCs of other partial D phenotypes will be classified as D+ in direct agglutination tests with some, if not all, currently available reagents. Testing donors for weak expression of D continues to be required, albeit that Rh alloimmunization by RBCs with a weak or partial D phenotype is uncommon. Further, because of differences in performance characteristics among FDA-approved reagents, conflicts between donor center D typing and transfusion service confirmatory test results are inevitable.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]