These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Discriminating measures and normal values for expiratory obstruction.
    Author: Hansen JE, Sun XG, Wasserman K.
    Journal: Chest; 2006 Feb; 129(2):369-377. PubMed ID: 16478854.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To develop mean and 95% confidence limits for the lower limit of normal (LLN) values for forced expiratory volume in 3 s (FEV3)/FVC ratio for Latin, black, and white adults; to ascertain comparative variability of the FEV1/FVC ratio, the FEV3/FVC ratio, and forced expiratory flow, midexpiratory phase (FEF(25-75)) in never-smoking adults; to evaluate their utility in measuring the effect of smoking on airflow limitation; and to develop and use the fraction of the FVC that had not been expired during the first 3 s of the FVC (1 - FEV3/FVC) to identify the growing fraction of long-time-constant lung units. DESIGN: Analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) database of never-smokers and current smokers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5,938 adult never-smokers and 3,570 current smokers from NHANES III with spirometric data meeting American Thoracic Society standards. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: After establishing new databases for never-smokers and current smokers, we quantified the mean and LLN values of FEV3/FVC in never-smokers, and identified spirometric abnormalities in current smokers. When associated with older age, FEV3/FVC decreases and 1 - FEV3/FVC increases as FEV1/FVC decreases. On average, using these measurements, the condition of current smokers worsened about 20 years faster than that of never-smokers by middle age. If < 80% of the mean predicted FEF(25-75) was used to identify abnormality, over one quarter of all never-smokers would have been falsely identified as being abnormal. Using 95% confidence limits, 42% of 683 smokers with reduced FEV1/FVC and/or FEV3/FVC would have been judged as normal by FEF(25-75). CONCLUSIONS: FEV1/FVC, FEV3/FVC, and 1 - FEV3/FVC characterize expiratory obstruction well. In contrast, FEF(25-75) measurements can be misleading and can cause an unacceptably large number of probable false-negative results and probable false-positive results.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]