These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparing two methods of measuring legislation compliance among indoor tanning facilities.
    Author: Hurd AL, Mayer JA, Woodruff SI, Belch GE, Patel MR.
    Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Mar; 54(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 16488294.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of compliance by tanning facilities to indoor tanning legislation is important. OBJECTIVE: This study compared a telephone-based measurement procedure with a face-to-face visit. METHODS: Indoor tanning facilities (N = 115) in San Diego County, California, were contacted by two adolescents posing as prospective customers using each method. Two compliance variables were assessed: number of times one can tan during 1 week and written parental consent for minors. RESULTS: Facility compliance with the frequency variable by face-to-face and telephone was 25.5% and 17.5%, respectively. These rates for the parental consent variable were 73.3% and 80.8%, respectively. Percent agreement between data collection methods was 71.3% for compliance with the frequency recommendation and 76.3% for parental consent regulation. Although traditional statistical tests indicated poor concordance, an alternative test indicated good concordance. LIMITATIONS: Levels of concordance for the confederates differed. CONCLUSION: Telephone assessment of compliance is fairly comparable with the more labor-intensive, face-to-face assessment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]