These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Use of prophylactic anticoagulation and the risk of hepatic veno-occlusive disease in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Author: Imran H, Tleyjeh IM, Zirakzadeh A, Rodriguez V, Khan SP.
    Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Apr; 37(7):677-86. PubMed ID: 16489362.
    Abstract:
    Hepatic veno-occlusive disease is a serious regimen-related toxicity in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the effect of anticoagulation in preventing veno-occlusive disease. Several databases and online journals were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Twelve studies (2782 patients) were eligible. Anticoagulation prophylaxis was associated with a statistically nonsignificant decrease in risk of veno-occlusive disease (pooled relative risk (RR), 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62-1.29). Results of one of three randomized controlled trials may have been affected by delayed introduction of anticoagulation. A second trial enrolled patients who received conventional chemoradiotherapy for early-stage disease (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.78). The third trial was a pilot study with a small sample size (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.04). Significant heterogeneity and methodologic weaknesses preclude drawing a meaningful conclusion from the pooled analysis. Despite some limitations, results of two of three eligible randomized controlled trials suggest that prophylactic anticoagulation may help prevent veno-occlusive disease. However, a large randomized controlled trial is needed for confirmation. Additionally, in future studies, owing to the wide spectrum of severity of veno-occlusive disease, outcomes such as 100-day mortality should strongly be considered.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]