These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Ultrasound tissue characterization of breast biopsy specimens.
    Author: Edmonds PD, Mortensen CL, Hill JR, Holland SK, Jensen JF, Schattner P, Valdes AD.
    Journal: Ultrason Imaging; 1991 Apr; 13(2):162-85. PubMed ID: 1650048.
    Abstract:
    Results of measurements of ultrasound speed and absorption coefficients in the range 3 to 8 MHz in breast tissues at 37 C are reported and analyzed in attempts to identify a set of ultrasound parameters capable of discriminating normal, benign, and malignant tissues. We analyzed 118 tissue regions, comprising 47 normal, 55 benign, and 16 malignant by straight-line fitting of frequency dependence of attenuation. Data for ten additional regions, for a total of 128, became available and were added to the cohort when we subsequently fitted quadratic curves. Sound speed consistently emerged as the variable with greatest discriminating power, particularly for separating normal from benign and malignant tissue. Great difficulty was encountered in discriminating benign from malignant, even when the jackknife technique was used. More success was found with classification and regression trees (CART), although results were sensitive to assigned misclassification costs. Best results from straight-line fits were obtained when discriminating malignant from combined normal/benign data after randomly assigning 75 percent of the data to the learning set and 25 percent to the test set. Then, 23 out of 25 normal/benign and 4 out of 4 malignant cases in the test set were correctly classified. With quadratic fitting, best results were obtained in the three-class case--the false positive rate for malignancy was reduced to zero in the learning (0/31) and test (0/10) sets. Nevertheless, the false negative rate increased to 13 out of 31 (42 percent) in the learning set, while attaining zero (0/4) in the test set.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]