These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Consanguinity and eye diseases with a potential genetic etiology. Data from a prevalence study in Andhra Pradesh, India.
    Author: Nirmalan PK, Krishnaiah S, Nutheti R, Shamanna BR, Rao GN, Thomas R.
    Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 13(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 16510341.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of consanguinity and its potential associations with eye diseases in Andhra Pradesh state of south India. METHODS: As part of a demographic interview schedule, prior to clinical examinations, trained investigators collected information regarding consanguinity of the parents from subjects randomly chosen for a population-based cross-sectional epidemiological study. Each subject underwent a detailed ocular examination including visual acuity measurements, anterior segment examinations with slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and posterior segment examinations. Adjusted odds ratios (OR), attributable risks (AR) and population attributable risks (PAR) were estimated. RESULTS: We obtained details regarding consanguinity of the parents from 10,290 of the 10,293 subjects who were enumerated and examined in the study. Parental consanguinity was reported by 1822 (24.7%) rural subjects and 782 (32.9%) urban subjects. Eighty (0.008%, 95% CI: 0.006, 0.010) of the 9757 subjects had an ocular disease with a potential genetic basis. We found microcornea to be significantly associated with both an uncle-niece relationship (adjusted OR: 7.32, 95% CI: 1.73, 30.97, AR = 86.34%, PAR = 42.11%) and a first-cousin relationship between the parents (adjusted OR 4.51, 95% CI: 1.05, 19.40, AR = 77.83%, PAR = 29.02%). Retinitis pigmentosa was significantly associated with a first-cousin relationship between the parents (adjusted OR: 5.31, 95% CI: 1.00, 28.25, AR = 81.17%, PAR = 33.43%). CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of consanguinity in this population does not appear to translate into a high prevalence of ocular malformations; however, studies with larger sample sizes are required to further explore the strength of these associations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]