These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Improving outcomes in depression: a focus on somatic symptoms.
    Author: McIntyre RS, Konarski JZ, Mancini DA, Zurowski M, Giacobbe P, Soczynska JK, Kennedy SH.
    Journal: J Psychosom Res; 2006 Mar; 60(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 16516660.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: It is hypothesized that somatic symptom alleviation is a significant predictor of overall outcome in depressed primary care patients. METHODS: Depressed primary care patients (N=205) meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria received open-label antidepressant therapy. The primary symptom measurement tool used was the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impression Improvement/Severity (CGI-I/S) used as secondary measures. As proxies for somatic symptoms, 8 items from the HAMD-17 (HAMD-S) and 3 items from the MADRS (MADRS-S) that measure somatic symptoms were identified and extracted. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between improvement on the HAMD-S score and overall reduction on the MADRS total score (r=.766, P<.001), response (r=.594, P<.001), and remission (r=.552, P<.001). Improvement on the MADRS-S also correlated with overall HAMD-17 improvement (r=.782, P<.001), along with response (r=.649, P<.001) and remission (r=.539, P<.001) rates. Both the HAMD-S and the MADRS-S correlated with global improvement as measured by the CGI-I/S (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: A reciprocal interaction between somatic symptoms and other depressive-symptom domains is implied by this analysis. Clinicians are encouraged to identify, track, and target the somatic symptoms of depressive illnesses.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]