These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Surface analysis and corrosion resistance of different stainless steel orthodontic brackets in artificial saliva.
    Author: Lin MC, Lin SC, Lee TH, Huang HH.
    Journal: Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):322-9. PubMed ID: 16539562.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the variation in corrosion resistance of commercial stainless steel (SS) brackets with different brands and types for the same application, using the electrochemical technique. The linear polarization test was used to evaluate the corrosion resistance, in terms of polarization resistance (Rp), of as-received commercial SS brackets in acidic artificial saliva. A two-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the Rp with the factors of brand and type. A scanning electron microscope and an atomic force microscope were used to analyze the surface morphology and roughness, respectively. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to identify the chemical composition of the passive film on SS brackets. Results showed that different brands of SS brackets had a statistically significant difference in Rp (P < .0001), whereas there was no statistical difference between the bracket types ("Roth" and standard) (P = .27). Different surface topography, including surface roughness and defect, was present among the tested SS brackets. The same passive film structure, containing Cr2O3/Fe2O3 with small amounts of NiO, was observed on all SS brackets. The surface topography of the commercial SS brackets with identical surface passive film structure did not correspond with the difference in corrosion resistance.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]